Friday, 7 May 2010

Mediator (jan18th-feb 5th)

Mediator
For this project we were split into groups of six and we were made to build or show something that represented our experience of Hospitalfield. Whilst walking around Hospitalfield our group had strong feelings of being unsettled and there was an unknown eeriness to the place. At the site it was very quiet and the only noises to be heard were the ones creasted by us. This created a feeling of solitude, as if we were the only living things in an almost dead site. There was a lot of plant life within the site and a walled garde at the centre. There were spaces within that were tight and standing in them gave you a feeling of claustrophobia.




We wanted to convey all the feelings we felt so we built an installation to express this. We built a tunnel or maze that would explore a journey of senses. The tunnel had changes in height and floor level to give the sense of unknowing. It was also pitch black and the participant would wear headphones with eerie music to heighten the experience. The walls were covered in textured material so that the participant didn't like what they were touching because of the feeling of unknown. At the end of the tunnel we had a sheet where they had to write one word to describe there experience so that we could see if our installation was effective.

Monday, 3 May 2010

Roof, wall structure and spatial effects of French Romanesque and Gothic churches

During the medieval period the two Architectural styles of Romanesque and Gothic were created and used in great success in the forms of large cathedrals. The Romanesque period flourished from the 10th to the 12th century and the successor to this was the Gothic movement which lasted from the 12th to the 16th century. There were great technological advances during this time to spread the loads and forces of the building, through the walls down to the ground, which in turn meant that the Architects could create dramatic, large, spacious buildings.

The Romanesque period brought about the use of more robust, fireproof materials, i.e. stone, which gave the cathedrals a more solid and heavy looking structure. The new introduction of creating buildings created entirely of stone proved to be a difficult challenge. Only through the continuous trial and error did they overcome this problem. As Fazio et al (2003) describe Romanesque buildings as a great series of experiments to enclose and illuminate interior space, using incombustible masonry construction to reduce the chances of fire and thus protect the valuable relics held in churches.

Greek spans were limited by narrowly spaced columns, but the Romans wanted to build large, unobstructed spaces and so used vaults on an unprecedented scale. A timber roof works in tension, because the vertical loads are distributed along the beams, but stone has limited tensile capabilities and works best in compression. The arch answers this problem by working only in compression. (Borden, Elzanowski et al 2008). This, along with barrel vaults and groin vaults, were some of the main features that are associated with Romanesque cathedrals.





The roman arch was built by building the stone work around a semi-circular frame and then was held in place by putting a keystone in the centre. The most important structural developments of Romanesque architecture is the vault. The vault was developed to enable the construction of stone roofs. The barrel vault was created by extending the arch horizontally which meant that much greater areas were able to be covered that were not possible with the post and lintel construction. There was one major problem with the barrel vault, the forces of the arch would cause the side walls to buckle. To overcome this, the walls of a Romanesque church were very thick and were built with windows being used sparingly as they reduced the structural integrity.


The groin vault is the result of the intersection of two barrel vaults of equal diameter at right angles to each other. The points of intersection form paraboloids that are known as groins (Borden, Elzanowski et al 2008). The innovation of creating this structure meant that the stresses from the roof could be directed to the four corners and down the point supports to the ground. As well as being a more structurally stable design it also gave the opportunity to link two volumes together.

The Romanesque movement gave the space within the churches a feeling of grandeur because of the high vaulted ceilings and stone walls. Your eyes are immediately drawn to the alter on the far side as soon as you enter. Within the space you can get a sense of tranquillity because of the abundance of curves and slithers of natural light entering the building.

The Gothic style succeeded the Romanesque style and originated in a region near Paris called Ile-de-France. Unlike Romanesque buildings, in which a continuous mass of wall is necessary to sustain the load, the Gothic structure is a skeletal system that transfers roof loads down to the ground at discrete points, thereby freeing large expanses of wall to be opened for windows. One can define Gothic buildings by their spatial characteristics, which tend to emphasize the vertical, consist of articulated but unified cells of space, and have a sense of openness afforded by the construction (Fazio et al 2003). The key attributes associated with Gothic architecture are the pointed arches, rib vaults and flying buttresses.


The pointed arch was used in Islamic culture before it was eventually inducted into medieval Architecture. During the Gothic era, builders discovered that pointed arches would give structures amazing strength and stability. In Gothic buildings, the weight of the roof was supported by the arches rather than the walls. This meant that walls could be thinner. As Fazio et al (2003) discuss that pointed arches are better approximations of catenary curves that represent the line of compressive force acting in any arch, and thus they exert less outward thrust. They also present considerable design flexibility, as one can vary to some extent the angle of the arch. Steeper angles generate less thrust. This was a great revelation as the architects could now raise vaults to higher than was possible in Romanesque architecture.


Ribbed vaulting functions in much the same manner as plain groined vaulting, except that it is reinforced with ribs, and can be made much thinner. The vault uses a pillars, permitting the walls to be hollowed out and thus, filled with windows, while also allowing the vaults to extend higher. Such light, skeletal construction employing cross ribbed-vaults replaced the massiveness of Romanesque vaults. This had the revolutionary effect of opening up the interior space of a large building such as a church.

The new use of piers to distribute the loads rather than along a thick wall meant that Gothic architects needed to reinforce the structure at strategic points, thus the flying buttress was created. The buttress join the skeletal structure at these points and are set at right angles. They extend externally and attach to another structure to divert the loads from the roof.
The new structural techniques encouraged medieval architects to be more adventurous with their designs because they could now build to heights that were not conceivable before. This meant that the majority of Gothic cathedrals had very large naves, towers and spires.
With the reinforcement provided by external buttresses, entire wall sections could be devoted to windows, particularly in the clerestory, where increased window height and width contributed to a diaphanous interior effect. Window tracery was introduced and became increasingly slender, evolving for plate tracery (punched openings in a solid field) to bar tracery (thin lines of cut stone set in geometric patterns). (Fazio et al 2003). This abundance of light that was entering the building successfully gave that spiritual, tranquil building that one would be looking for when entering a cathedral.



The design of the cathedrals were very aesthetically pleasing because in many cases they were the main focal points of cities. There would be figures carved into the walls, such as apostles. The spires of the cathedrals would be highly decorated with masonry techniques. The windows would often be filled with very colourful stained glass depicting various passages of the bible.

Gothic and Romanesque cathedrals were very different in terms of structure and aesthetics but it was easy to see the different spatial effects that were being achieved by the use of both of the techniques. . Whereas the Romanesque gave you the feeling of tranquillity. Gothic architecture gave the impression of majestic, spiritual, grand and light filled building.

Scottish Parliament

Scottish Parliament


Do you want classic columns and predictable pediments? A growl of old Gothic grandeur? A blissfully boring box? Not here, no thanks! No icon, no IKEA, no iceberg, but curves and caverns, nooks and niches, huddles and heavens syncopations and surprises. Leave symmetry to the cemetery. (Open the doors! E. Morgan)

This little extract is exactly what best describes the emotions that are felt when one thinks of the Scottish parliament building. In 1997 there was a referendum where the Scottish population voted to the creation of a Scottish parliament. With this act there was a need for a new building which would represent a modern Scotland, a parliament where nothing is done un-noticed by the people.

In 1998 Enric Miralles from EMBT, with Edinburgh based RMJM, won the competition to design the new building. His main concept was a building which grew from the landscape in a petal and stem shape. The theme of nature is very obvious with the abundance of natural light and natural ventilation. Many parts of the building are covered in vegetation that is elevated to the windows so that when a politician looks out, they see the Scottish landscape. In 1999 construction started on the building but Enric Miralles died in July 2000; his widow, Benedetta Tagliabue, took over as one of the lead architects. The building was finally opened in 2004.


The entrance hall is the first place that one enters and there are 3 very large concrete vaults which holds the debating chamber above. The vaults are meant to be an abstract representation of the solitaire. A light well in each of the three vaults allows natural light to penetrate the space. These vaults give a good representation of a solid building and in turn a solid government. Also this is where all the public enter which gives the impression of the public are “supporting” the debating chamber and without them there would be nothing.



The floor of the chamber contains seating for 128 members, plus additional seats for the Lord Advocate and Solicitor General, in a semi-circular lay out. The Public, Press and Guest galleries are on the next level. At gallery level there are views out over the landscaping towards the Palace of Holyrood house and Salisbury Crags (http://www.arcspace.com). The room itself is supposed to interact with the public because they are so close to the politicians. The seating arrangement in a semi-circular shape gives a non confrontational style to the chamber as opposed to Westminster where opposing parties sit opposite eachother. To further emphasise this, there are no labels to justify where a single member of parliament should sit. To reiterate Miralles’s idea of nothing goes un-noticed there are abstract forms within the windows which are meant to represent a human figure so that even when there is no one in the viewing gallery, the politicians are still being watched.


The roof structure of the debating chamber is a very intriguing one because the space with it is so vast and open with no use of pillars to obstruct the view. As arcspace.com say the roof structure, of laminated oak beams and 111 stainless steel nodes (connecting joints), each slightly different, is clearly visible from within the chamber. Amongst the skeletal system there are 276 lights which are there so that no matter where a politician sits they will always have a light focusing on them.


The MSP foyer space is the social centre of the complex, linking all the areas of the building. The foyer roof consists of a curved roof plane into which are located 13 leaf-shaped roof lights of differing sizes and orientations, allowing natural light to flood the space.
Many of the steel panels around the roof lights have cut -outs which form the shape of part of the map of the west coast of Scotland. Looking beyond the cut-out, the shape of the panels which feature on the façades of many of the buildings can be seen. These panels have a functional use as behind them are vents, linked to the building management system, which open automatically to allow natural ventilation to circulate around the Garden Lobby.

The materials used within the building tried to be local: oak was used on the exterior of the building to imitate bamboo and within the debating chamber; Kemnay granite and concrete from Dunbar is used throughout; Caithness stone for flooring.


The original budget for the Scottish parliament building was £40 million but by the end of the project it had increased drastically to £431 million. This was a big reason why the building was scrutinised so much by the public. In my opinion to get a building which successfully represents the start of a truly modern Scotland and effectively involves the public throughout all the spaces, money should not be taken into account when thinking of national pride.